Get the fair value you deserve for your totaled vehicle in Tennessee

Tennessee regulates first-party automobile total losses through three layered authorities: the Improper Claim Practices statute at Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-8-104, the motor-vehicle-specific settlement-practices statute at Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-8-105, and the bad-faith refusal-to-pay penalty at Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105. Tennessee does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause. Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-8-104 — Improper Claim Practices. The statute defines acts that constitute improper claim settlement practices when committed in conscious disregard of the policy or with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. Prohibited acts include: misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions; failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness on claim communications; failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims; refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation; failing to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time after proof-of-loss requirements are completed; not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlement when liability is reasonably clear; compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered; and failing to settle one portion of a claim promptly to influence settlement of other portions. Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-8-105 — Motor Vehicle Insurance; Total Loss Settlement. The statute requires insurers handling first-party automobile total-loss claims to use a method that produces a reasonable approximation of the vehicle's actual cash value at the time of loss, considering the local market value of comparable vehicles of like kind and quality. The settlement amount must include applicable taxes, license fees, and other transfer fees. The implementing rules at Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0780-1-5 develop the documentation and itemization requirements. Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105 — Bad-Faith Refusal to Pay Insurance Claims. When an insurer refuses to pay a loss within sixty (60) days after a written demand by the policyholder, and the court or jury finds that the refusal was not in good faith and that the failure inflicted additional expense, loss, or injury (including attorney's fees) on the policyholder, the insurer is liable for the loss plus interest plus a sum not exceeding twenty-five percent (25%) of the liability for the loss. The 60-day demand-and-wait procedure is the operational gate: a written demand for payment, followed by a 60-day window in which the insurer can resolve the claim in good faith. After 60 days of non-resolution, the bad-faith remedy attaches if the insured prevails. Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-211 — Salvage Title Threshold. A vehicle less than ten years old for which the cost of repairs to its pre-accident condition equals or exceeds 75% of its actual cash value before the damage must be branded as a salvage vehicle. The 75% threshold sets the operational total-loss decision point in Tennessee for vehicles within the ten-year window; vehicles ten or more years old are subject to a different scheme. Tennessee does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause.

Tennessee's § 56-7-105 bad-faith remedy traces back to 1901 (Acts 1901, ch. 141), making it one of the oldest statutory bad-faith frameworks in the country. The Tennessee Supreme Court in Heil Co. v. Evanston Insurance Co., 690 F.3d 722 (6th Cir. 2012) (applying Tennessee law), and the Tennessee Court of Appeals in numerous decisions have emphasized that the "not in good faith" standard is fact-intensive and that an insurer's refusal to investigate reasonably, reliance on a position without legal or factual support, or failure to follow regulatory procedures supports the bad-faith finding. The 25% cap is statutory; the actual award depends on the trial court's assessment of the additional expense, loss, or injury inflicted. Tennessee courts have also clarified that § 56-7-105 is the exclusive remedy for bad-faith refusal to pay insurance claims in the first-party context — Tennessee does not recognize a separate common-law tort of bad faith for first-party claims, distinguishing it from states like Indiana (Erie v. Hickman) or Wisconsin (Anderson v. Continental). The statutory 60-day-written-demand procedure is the procedural gate, and Tennessee Court of Appeals decisions have repeatedly held that the demand must be specific and in writing. In the auto-claim context, recent multistate class actions targeting "typical-negotiation adjustment" and similar undocumented Audatex/CCC line items have been pleaded as both § 56-8-104/56-8-105 regulatory violations and § 56-7-105 bad-faith claims, because Tennessee's documentation and ACV-approximation requirements are explicit and the 25% statutory penalty creates real economic exposure.