Get the fair value you deserve for your totaled vehicle in Maine

Maine regulates first-party automobile total losses through three layered authorities: the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act at 24-A M.R.S. § 2164-D, the implementing claim-handling regulation at Bureau of Insurance Rule 220, and the private-right-of-action statute with treble damages at 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A. Maine does not recognize a common-law first-party bad-faith tort — the Maine Supreme Judicial Court declined to do so in Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993), reasoning that the legislature had spoken through § 2436-A. Maine does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause. 24-A M.R.S. § 2164-D — Unfair Claim Settlement Practices. The statute defines acts that constitute unfair claim settlement practices, including: misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions; failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness on claim communications; failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims; refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation; failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time; not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements when liability is reasonably clear; and compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due. Bureau of Insurance Rule 220 — Claim-Handling Regulation. The regulation establishes specific standards for first-party automobile total-loss settlements: (a) Comparable vehicles. The insurer shall determine actual cash value using the cost of two or more comparable automobiles available to the insured in the local market area, of like kind, quality, age, and mileage. (b) Dealer quotations. The insurer may, in lieu of comparable vehicles, base the settlement on two or more written quotations from licensed dealers in the local market area. (c) Statistically valid valuation source. The insurer may rely on a statistically valid fair-market-value source for the local market area. (d) Adjustments. Adjustments for vehicle condition, mileage, prior damage, or required repair must be measurable, discernible, itemized, and specified in dollar amounts in the claim file. (e) Right of Recourse. If the insured cannot purchase a comparable vehicle in the local market area for the offered amount, the insurer shall reopen the claim and either locate a comparable, pay the difference, offer a replacement, or invoke the policy's appraisal clause. 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A — Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Private Right of Action. Maine is one of a small number of states with an explicit private right of action under the UCSPA. The statute provides that any insured aggrieved by an unfair claim settlement practice may recover compensatory damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and — when the insurer's conduct is intentional or reckless — exemplary damages of up to three times the compensatory damages. Combined with the prompt-payment provisions of 24-A M.R.S. § 2436, which require interest at 1.5% per month on amounts not paid within 30 days after due, § 2436-A provides the operational lever for Maine first-party total-loss litigation. 24-A M.R.S. § 2436 — Prompt Payment. The statute requires every insurer to pay or deny a claim within 30 days after receipt of proof of loss. If the insurer fails to pay within 30 days, simple interest at 1.5% per month accrues from the date the claim was payable. Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993). The Maine Supreme Judicial Court declined to recognize a common-law first-party bad-faith tort, holding that the legislature had spoken through 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A and that creating a parallel tort would be inconsistent with the legislative scheme. Subsequent Maine decisions have reaffirmed Marquis; § 2436-A remains the primary statutory lever, and its treble-damages framework is itself substantial. 29-A M.R.S. § 1855 — Salvage Title Threshold. A vehicle for which the cost of repairs to its pre-loss condition equals or exceeds 75% of its fair market value before the loss must be branded as a salvage vehicle. The 75% threshold sets the operational total-loss decision point. Maine does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause.

Maine's first-party insurance jurisprudence is shaped by a deliberate legislative choice — the codification of an unusually strong UCSPA private right of action with treble damages at 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A — combined with a Supreme Judicial Court decision (Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993)) declining to recognize a separate common-law bad-faith tort. Marquis held that the legislature had spoken through § 2436-A and that creating a parallel common-law tort would be inconsistent with the legislative scheme. The decision was perceived at the time as restrictive, but the § 2436-A treble-damages framework that Marquis preserved is itself substantial — comparable to or greater than many states' common-law tort frameworks in financial exposure. Subsequent Maine decisions including Linscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 368 A.2d 1161 (Me. 1977), and Estate of Hoch v. Stifel, 16 A.3d 137 (Me. 2011), have applied the § 2436-A and § 2436 framework in the auto-claim context. The "intentional or reckless" exemplary-damages standard has been treated as a lower bar than "willful, wanton, or malicious," allowing recovery of treble damages on documented regulatory violations rather than requiring proof of the most egregious insurer conduct. In the auto-claim total-loss context, recent multistate class actions targeting "typical-negotiation adjustment" and similar undocumented Audatex/CCC line items have been pleaded in Maine as both Bureau Rule 220 regulatory violations and § 2436-A private-right-of-action claims, with the § 2436 1.5%-per-month interest accrual layered on top. The combined statutory framework generates substantial settlement leverage without requiring proof of common-law bad faith.